RFC 9626: Video Frame Marking RTP Header Extension

This document describes a Video Frame Marking RTP header extension used to convey information about video frames that is critical for error recovery and…

Read RFC 9626 on the RFC Editor

Outgoing relationships (17 related RFCs)

Normative reference — RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
Normative reference — RFC 8174: Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words
Normative reference — RFC 6190: RTP Payload Format for Scalable Video Coding
Normative reference — RFC 6184: RTP Payload Format for H.264 Video
Normative reference — RFC 8285: A General Mechanism for RTP Header Extensions
Normative reference — RFC 7741: RTP Payload Format for VP8 Video
Normative reference — RFC 7798: RTP Payload Format for High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC)
Informative reference — RFC 3550: RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications
Informative reference — RFC 3711: The Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP)
Informative reference — RFC 5104: Codec Control Messages in the RTP Audio-Visual Profile with Feedback (AVPF)
Informative reference — RFC 7656: A Taxonomy of Semantics and Mechanisms for Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Sources
Informative reference — RFC 7667: RTP Topologies
Informative reference — RFC 6464: A Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) Header Extension for Client-to-Mixer Audio Level Indication
Informative reference — RFC 8871: A Solution Framework for Private Media in Privacy-Enhanced RTP Conferencing (PERC)
Informative reference — RFC 9627: The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message
Informative reference — RFC 9628: RTP Payload Format for VP9 Video
Informative reference — RFC 9335: Completely Encrypting RTP Header Extensions and Contributing Sources

Incoming relationships (1 related RFC)

Normatively referenced by — RFC 9627: The Layer Refresh Request (LRR) RTCP Feedback Message