RFC 7965: LDP Extensions for Pseudowire Binding to Label Switched Path (LSP) Tunnels

Many transport services require that user traffic, in the form of Pseudowires (PWs), be delivered via either a single co-routed bidirectional tunnel or two…

Read RFC 7965 on the RFC Editor

Outgoing relationships (13 related RFCs)

Normative reference — RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
Normative reference — RFC 4447: Pseudowire Setup and Maintenance Using the Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
Normative reference — RFC 6370: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Identifiers
Informative reference — RFC 5226: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
Informative reference — RFC 3209: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels
Informative reference — RFC 5920: Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks
Informative reference — RFC 5036: LDP Specification
Informative reference — RFC 3985: Pseudo Wire Emulation Edge-to-Edge (PWE3) Architecture
Informative reference — RFC 4090: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels
Informative reference — RFC 6073: Segmented Pseudowire
Informative reference — RFC 6373: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Control Plane Framework
Informative reference — RFC 6923: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Identifiers Following ITU-T Conventions
Informative reference — RFC 7267: Dynamic Placement of Multi-Segment Pseudowires