RFC 6848: Specifying Civic Address Extensions in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)

New fields are occasionally added to civic addresses. A backward- compatible mechanism for adding civic address elements to the Geopriv civic address format…

Read RFC 6848 on the RFC Editor

Outgoing relationships (13 related RFCs)

Updates, Normative reference — RFC 5222: LoST: A Location-to-Service Translation Protocol
Updates, Normative reference — RFC 4776: Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCPv4 and DHCPv6) Option for Civic Addresses Configuration Information
Normative reference — RFC 2119: Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels
Normative reference — RFC 5226: Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs
Normative reference — RFC 3629: UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646
Normative reference — RFC 3688: The IETF XML Registry
Normative reference — RFC 6280: An Architecture for Location and Location Privacy in Internet Applications
Normative reference — RFC 5139: Revised Civic Location Format for Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO)
Normative reference — RFC 3694: Threat Analysis of the Geopriv Protocol
Informative reference — RFC 5012: Requirements for Emergency Context Resolution with Internet Technologies
Informative reference — RFC 5985: HTTP-Enabled Location Delivery (HELD)
Informative reference — RFC 4079: A Presence Architecture for the Distribution of GEOPRIV Location Objects
Informative reference — RFC 5774: Considerations for Civic Addresses in the Presence Information Data Format Location Object (PIDF-LO): Guidelines and IANA Registry Definition

Incoming relationships (2 related RFCs)

Normatively referenced by — RFC 7035: Relative Location Representation
Informatively referenced by — RFC 7852: Additional Data Related to an Emergency Call