RFC 6372: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Survivability Framework

Network survivability is the ability of a network to recover traffic delivery following failure or degradation of network resources. Survivability is critical…

Read RFC 6372 on the RFC Editor

Outgoing relationships (32 related RFCs)

Normative reference — RFC 3209: RSVP-TE: Extensions to RSVP for LSP Tunnels
Normative reference — RFC 2205: Resource ReSerVation Protocol (RSVP) -- Version 1 Functional Specification
Normative reference — RFC 3473: Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE) Extensions
Normative reference — RFC 3471: Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Signaling Functional Description
Normative reference — RFC 4203: OSPF Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Normative reference — RFC 3945: Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Architecture
Normative reference — RFC 5586: MPLS Generic Associated Channel
Normative reference — RFC 5307: IS-IS Extensions in Support of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Normative reference — RFC 5654: Requirements of an MPLS Transport Profile
Normative reference — RFC 5921: A Framework for MPLS in Transport Networks
Normative reference — RFC 4873: GMPLS Segment Recovery
Normative reference — RFC 6371: Operations, Administration, and Maintenance Framework for MPLS-Based Transport Networks
Normative reference — RFC 4204: Link Management Protocol (LMP)
Normative reference — RFC 4427: Recovery (Protection and Restoration) Terminology for Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)
Normative reference — RFC 5317: Joint Working Team (JWT) Report on MPLS Architectural Considerations for a Transport Profile
Normative reference — RFC 5950: Network Management Framework for MPLS-based Transport Networks
Normative reference — RFC 4428: Analysis of Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS)-based Recovery Mechanisms (including Protection and Restoration)
Informative reference — RFC 3031: Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture
Informative reference — RFC 5920: Security Framework for MPLS and GMPLS Networks
Informative reference — RFC 4872: RSVP-TE Extensions in Support of End-to-End Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery
Informative reference — RFC 6291: Guidelines for the Use of the "OAM" Acronym in the IETF
Informative reference — RFC 4726: A Framework for Inter-Domain Multiprotocol Label Switching Traffic Engineering
Informative reference — RFC 5212: Requirements for GMPLS-Based Multi-Region and Multi-Layer Networks (MRN/MLN)
Informative reference — RFC 4874: Exclude Routes - Extension to Resource ReserVation Protocol-Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
Informative reference — RFC 3469: Framework for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)-based Recovery
Informative reference — RFC 4397: A Lexicography for the Interpretation of Generalized Multiprotocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Terminology within the Context of the ITU-T's Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) Architecture
Informative reference — RFC 4426: Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS) Recovery Functional Specification
Informative reference — RFC 4783: GMPLS - Communication of Alarm Information
Informative reference — RFC 5817: Graceful Shutdown in MPLS and Generalized MPLS Traffic Engineering Networks
Informative reference — RFC 6373: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Control Plane Framework
Informative reference — RFC 3386: Network Hierarchy and Multilayer Survivability
Informative reference — RFC 5298: Analysis of Inter-Domain Label Switched Path (LSP) Recovery

Incoming relationships (9 related RFCs)

Normatively referenced by — RFC 6373: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Control Plane Framework
Informatively referenced by — RFC 9522: Overview and Principles of Internet Traffic Engineering
Informatively referenced by — RFC 7271: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Linear Protection to Match the Operational Expectations of Synchronous Digital Hierarchy, Optical Transport Network, and Ethernet Transport Network Operators
Informatively referenced by — RFC 6965: MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Applicability: Use Cases and Design
Informatively referenced by — RFC 6974: Applicability of MPLS Transport Profile for Ring Topologies
Informatively referenced by — RFC 7167: A Framework for Point-to-Multipoint MPLS in Transport Networks
Informatively referenced by — RFC 8184: Dual-Homing Protection for MPLS and the MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires
Informatively referenced by — RFC 8185: Dual-Homing Coordination for MPLS Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) Pseudowires Protection
Informatively referenced by — RFC 9270: GMPLS Signaling Extensions for Shared Mesh Protection